News
In Just 20 Years, Ships Could Cross an Open Arctic Ocean
Sailing via the North Pole was impossible until the 1950s. Now, it is all but inevitable. Even if all greenhouse gas emissions ceased, the Arctic Ocean is set to become ice-free in September by 2050.
Last summer, I wrote a blog post entitled, “The Arctic shipping route no one’s talking about.” Now, with four colleagues – Scott Stephenson, Kang Yang, Michael Bravo, and Bert De Jonghe – I’ve elaborated on the ideas explored in the post in the form of a peer-reviewed article, which has just been published in Marine Policy.
The latest scientific models suggest that a route directly via the North Pole may open as early as the 2040s. As we point out, this is significantly sooner than what models predicted in the early 2000s, when the consensus was that the Central Arctic Ocean would not become ice-free in summer until the 2070s.
The Transpolar Sea Route (TSR) will first open for a brief period in September of each year, when Arctic sea ice reaches its annual minimum. As climate change continues apace, the season will likely gradually lengthen to a point at which shipping via the TSR could become more commonplace.
New infrastructure needs: Ice-class vessels and transshipment hubs
Once open, the TSR will represent a third Arctic shipping route in addition to the Northern Sea Route (NSR) and Northwest Passage. The route will not suddenly spring into use just because sea ice disappears, however. Shipping requires infrastructure, from vessels to ports and search and rescue equipment.
Already, more ice-class vessels are being built — often in Chinese shipyards — to support gas development on the Yamal Peninsula and resource extraction in northern Canada and Greenland. Other ice-class vessels that have been in existence for many years are servicing new, more northern sites. In November 2019, for instance, MV Nordic Barents – the same ship which made the first foreign-flagged transit of the Northern Sea Route in 2010 – carried 41,000 tons of ilmenite from Moriusaq, Greenland to Quebec. Such ice-class ships could conceivably be employed along the TSR, too.
If they are robust enough, ice-class ships could sail directly across the North Pole from a port in Asia to a port in Europe without any need to stop. Yet since operating ice-class ships tends to be costlier than conventional open-water ships, shipping lines prefer to minimize the distance they have to sail.
Calling at Nome, Longyearbyen, and Finnafjord?
A more cost-effective alternative to using ice-class ships for point-to-point shipping, as we discuss, might be to build transshipment ports around the entrances to the TSR in the Bering Strait, between Alaska and Russia, and the Fram Strait, near Svalbard. At these ports, cargo could be switched between ice-class ships sailing in polar waters and open-water vessels headed south. In three places in particular — Nome (Alaska), Longyearbyen (Svalbard), and Finnafjord (Iceland) — plans are underway to build ports that could support trans-Arctic shipping.
Port construction is a costly undertaking. National and state governments that may have stepped up in the past to build quays and warehouses are now cash-strapped. Increasingly, private-public partnerships and even foreign investment are taking the place of public funds. Foreign capital nowadays often originates with state-owned port holdings companies based in China and the United Arab Emirates. Dubai-headquartered DP World, for instance, recently signed a memorandum of understanding with Russian partners to jointly develop the Northern Sea Route.
As the TSR develops, two Arctic powers — Russia, a historic one, and China, an emerging one — will no doubt be countries to watch.
Russia: beware the opening of the TSR
For Russia, the TSR could undermine the attractiveness of the NSR. For starters, a route via the North Pole cuts off a further 1-5 days for journeys between Asia and Europe compared to the route hugging the Russian coastline.
The TSR’s bathymetry is also more favorable to large ships with bigger drafts. The NSR’s shallow straits mean that it’s all but impossible for the Panamax ships, which are already becoming outdated as shipping lines seek greater economies of scale and ever-larger ships, to transit. This summer, the Panamaxes that will be plying the NSR will, as usual, have to sail north of the New Siberian Islands. If sea ice retreats sufficiently, shipping lines might decide not to bother with the NSR at all. Sailing via the TSR would avoid the hefty icebreaker escort fees that the Russian government mandates regardless of the presence of ice.
China: a pioneer in 21st-century Arctic exploration
China appears to be the only country that has explored all three Arctic shipping routes. The country’s original icebreaker, MV Xue Long, carried out China’s first transit of the Central Arctic Ocean in 2017. Linking scientific expeditions to transportation opportunities, two Chinese scholars expressed, “China’s eighth Arctic expedition team crossed the Central Passage for the first time by icebreaker Xuelong, successfully opening a new sea route linking Eurasia.”
Now, the country’s first domestically built icebreaker, MV Xue Long 2, which launched in 2018, is currently on its first voyage through the Central Arctic Ocean. Given the increasing role China plays in Arctic maritime development, especially along the Northern Sea Route, the state and its associated entities may seek to assist with building infrastructure to support the TSR. These efforts could eventually parlay into efforts to participate in governance of the new shipping route, too.
Nevertheless, it’s worth underscoring that a robust international regulatory system is in place to regulate shipping in the Central Arctic Ocean. The United Nations Convention on the Law of the Sea (UNCLOS) and the International Maritime Organization’s Polar Code set many of the globally agreed ground rules regarding sailing in the high seas through which much of the TSR runs. The signing of a 16-year moratorium on fishing in the Central Arctic Ocean in 2018 also points to how governance in these increasingly accessible waters continues to be formalized and strengthened.
Does it matter who owns the North Pole?
Despite all the hullabaloo about conflicts over “who owns the North Pole,” however the Arctic states’ claims to extended continental shelves are resolved, they likely won’t impact usage of the TSR. That’s because the waters over the extended continental shelves will remain the high seas, through which all states have the freedom of navigation.
Some issues remain unclear, however. For instance, UNCLOS Article 234 allows states to enact environmental regulations in ice-covered waters in their exclusive economic zones, which extend roughly 200 nautical miles out from their coastlines. Both national governments and environmental organizations would undoubtedly want this clause to continue to apply even as the ice is melts, but whether the law will still be interpreted in their favor remains subject to debate.
Making Arctic shipping work for locals
From afar, trans-Arctic shipping may seem exciting, exotic, and even romantic. But it’s crucial to remember that a maritime route via the North Pole is coming at the cost of the Arctic as we know it, and as it has been known for millions of years.
The impacts of a seasonally ice-free shipping lane across the North Pole will be felt most acutely at the local rather than global scale. The more vessels there are, the greater the risks of air pollution and oil slicks and spills. Ice-breaking vessels could also damage the ice on which many Arctic species rely, from walruses to polar bears. Indigenous Peoples, especially in the Bering Strait, still depend on many of these animals for subsistence. Shipping-related disturbances to the Arctic’s flora and fauna could negatively impact the health of people living in the region, along with their cultural and spiritual well-being.
Certain national governments also display a flagrant disregard for the needs and priorities of local and Indigenous Peoples. Once the Trump administration came into power, it disbanded the Bering Sea Climate Resilience Area that Obama had enacted granting Indigenous Peoples co-management rights. Trump’s sudden move provoked “outrage” and “disappointment” from Bering Straits Elders.
Rubbing salt into the wound, the U.S. Army Corps of Engineers recently determined that port construction in Nome, Alaska would have “no impact” on Indigenous Peoples. Kawerak, Inc., the non-profit division of the Bering Straits Regional Corporation, strongly disputes that conclusion.
These two incidents underscore that while Indigenous Peoples have been gaining greater influence in Arctic discussions over the past two decades, that positive trajectory can suddenly be reversed. Regional bodies like the Arctic Council that are less subject to volatile national politics should therefore endeavor to chart a steadier, more upward course for Indigenous rightsholders in the Arctic.
There is a way to make the opening of the TSR work for both local residents and global markets. Harbors could be dredged in a way that avoids disturbing local archaeological heritage (i.e. by not running roughshod over ancient sites, as iron ore mining company Rio Tinto controversially did in the Juukan Gorge in Australia’s Pilbara region this past May). Ports could be built to accommodate both large vessels and small skiffs used for subsistence purposes. And local people could be ensured jobs in port operations.
Lessons from Svalbard, where the archipelago’s many years of experience with shipping has enabled the local community to develop the requisite institutions and regulations to help manage the industry’s growth, could perhaps be applied more proactively to places in the Arctic where large vessels are appearing for the first time.
The final countdown to an ice-free North Pole
Sailing via the North Pole was impossible until the 1950s. Now, it is all but inevitable. Even if all greenhouse gas emissions ceased today, scientists have concluded that the Arctic Ocean is pretty much set to become ice-free in September by 2050.
Approximately thirty years ago, the first icebreaker carrying tourists to the North Pole had to plow through thick multi-year ice despite it being summer. Now, we have twenty to thirty years to prepare for a world of ice-free, blue-ocean, trans-Arctic sailings.
Let’s hope we use that time wisely.
Source: www.maritime-executive.com
Other News by Category
General Shipping & Maritime
-
Port of Rotterdam Reports Success in Bunker Spill Cleanup
-
Day of the Seafarer: Mental Wellbeing in Focus
-
Posidonia 2018: 5 Most Exciting Things to Watch Out for in Shipping Industry
-
North Korea's High-Seas Fuel Smuggling Continues
-
Meyer Turku hands over new-design Mein Schiff 1
-
92% Of Seafarers Strongly Influenced By Internet Access – Futurenautics
-
Container ship MSC Kia Ora banned from Australian ports
-
Carnival to increase capacity on short cruise program with arrival of Carnival Dream in 2019
-
LNG cruise ships herald new era of training
-
Kinder Morgan takes delivery of 4th tanker from Philly Shipyard
Safety & Piracy
-
Three Killed, Five Missing After Two Ships Collide Near Shanghai
-
Oil tanker hit by blast at Saudi terminal, Saudi Arabia confirms
-
AMSA To End Permit That Allowed Seafarers To Work Longer Than 11 Months On Board Ships
-
Pirates Kidnap 19 in Two Separate Incidents in Gulf of Guinea -Dryad
-
ONE Containership Diverted to Tacoma Due to Collapsed Containers
-
Container Incident in Bristol Channel
-
Australia Evacuates Crew from Coronavirus-hit Livestock Carrier
-
Here’s One Way To Avoid COVID19 – Set Your Ship Adrift In Arctic Ice
-
Containership with Cracked Hull Leaking Fuel Oil in Bayonne, NJ
-
ICS, UNHCR and IOM call on States to end humanitarian crisis onboard ship in the Mediterranean
Maritime Economy
-
X-Bow Design Could Help Solve Air Draft Challenges for Boxships
-
How Eastern Pacific Shipping Achieved its CO2 Target Two Years Early
-
Dutch Seafarers Threatened With Dismissal Petition Maersk Shareholders For Help
-
Sailor Dies, 3 Injured on Bulker in Atlantic Storm
-
Cargo Boom Continues at Nation’s Second-Busiest Port
-
Japan’s MOL Scraps its Oldest LNG Carrier in Fleet Modernization
-
Maersk Essen Arrives in Mexico with Collapsed Containers
-
Steel cutting commences for Proman Stena Bulk’s methanol-fuelled tanker
-
World’s Largest VLEC Departs Texas with Record Shipment to China
-
Port of Long Beach Reports Busiest Year in 2020 Despite Headwinds
Environment & Technology
-
A.P. Moller- Maersk, The Ocean Cleanup extend relationship with new three-year partnership
-
Top charterers agree to publish shipping emissions data
-
MSC Sees Hydrogen And Biofuels As Key Components Of Shipping’s Future Fuel Mix
-
Storm-weary U.S. energy producers, refiners prep for hurricane strike
-
In Just 20 Years, Ships Could Cross an Open Arctic Ocean
-
As Arctic Ice Melts, Polluting Ships Stream Into Polar Waters
-
Hapag-Lloyd to lower CO2 emissions using biofuel
-
GLOBAL: NEW REPORT CLAIMS LNG AS MARINE FUEL IS ‘WORSE THAN BUSINESS AS USUAL FOR THE CLIMATE’
-
Study: New Blends of Marine Fuels Have Higher BC Emissions than HFO
-
New Report Identifies Clean Energy Options for Global Shipping Industry
Offshore, Oil & Gas
-
Rise in New Southeast Asia Upstream Players
-
Iraq looks to rebuild tanker fleet, eyes crude oil sales on delivered basis
-
Interview: Methanol Is Ready for Use as Marine Fuel
-
Chevron Announces Gorgon Expansion
-
Interview: What Will Be THE Marine Fuel of the Future?
-
Skangas Celebrates Milestone with 1,000 LNG Bunkering Operations in 2017
-
New LNG Carrier Design Suits “Milk Run”
-
Japan Commissions Oil Tanker To Combat Chinese Presence In East China Sea
-
Danish Energy Agency Clears Maersk Oil Sale
-
Offshore architects diversify and look to new roles for existing designs
Port & Shipbuilding
-
Bulk Shipping Comes Back to Oakland Port
-
Port of Newcastle to become the first Australian port to join the International EcoPorts network
-
CSP Abu Dhabi Terminal opens at Khalifa Port
-
North Sea Port: We Are Ready to Invest in Hydrogen as Fuel
-
Port Awarded $50 Million for Zero Emissions Project
-
New container terminal planned for Port of Newcastle
-
Port of Gothenburg Adds LNG Bunkering Option
-
China’s conquest of European box ports
-
Damen acquires Daewoo’s Mangalia yard
-
ICTSI approves Iraq’s BGT development
Events & Press Releases
-
Nakilat records 13% increased profits for the first quarter of 2018
-
Cargo throughput of UCL Holding’s stevedoring division rises 9% to 37.1 million tonnes
-
International Sea Ports and Maritime Authorities Gather in 2 Weeks to Discuss Port Security Technology
-
Hydropower Balkans 2017
-
Hydropower Balkans 2017 - Free Webinar
-
Speaker Line Up is Announced for the Maritime Big Data Forum at Nor-Shipping on 30 May
-
Sea Asia 2017 Reinforces Role as Leading Maritime Forum in Southeast Asia
-
10th International Fujairah Bunkering & Fuel Oil Forum: Event Summary
-
Counter-Terrorism Measures at Ports
-
DHT Holdings, Inc. announces delivery of first VLCC from BW Group
National (Croatian)
-
Uljanik plovidba ulazi na tržište prijevoza ukapljenog plina
-
Hrvatska brodogradnja - poslovi vrijedni 1,9 milijardi dolara
-
Zanimanje po kojem je Hrvatska oduvijek bila poznata u svijetu potrebno je spašavati od izumiranja
-
Drama u Arapskom moru: Naš tanker iz Uljanika napali pirati
-
Luka Rijeka planira od ulagača privući 300 milijuna kuna
-
Uljaniku i »3. maju« gradnja 20 brodova u idućih 15 godina
-
Floti Jadrolinije priključen brod „Mljet“
-
Jadroliniji prijete tužbe teške 20 milijuna kuna
-
U lovu na konkurente: Rijeka raste, ali promet luke u Kopru i dalje je četiri puta veći
-
Treća novogradnja u seriji, brod „Krk“ svečano priključen floti Jadrolinije